CSN Login
Members Online: 14

You are here

Was an effected lymph node or nodes always found before mets was diagnosed?

Posts: 66
Joined: Jun 2011

I was wondering if an effected lymph node was discovered before a metastasis was diagnosed in anyone's experience with RCC? I do remember seeing one post where it was mentioned "the doctors at Dana Farber were puzzled" as there was no sign of impacted lymph nodes.

Texas_wedge's picture
Posts: 2807
Joined: Nov 2011

Like most here, I'm just an interested party trying to pick up information as I go along, with no special knowledge. As far as I've gathered, there are three ways that metastasis occurs - by direct encroachment of a tumour into adjacent tissues, by transport of cancer cells in the bloodstream or in the lymphatic circulation system. If that's correct, mets. can occur without any involvement of lymph nodes.

lbinmsp's picture
Posts: 266
Joined: Jun 2006

During my initial surgery (radical nephrectomy) lymph nodes were sampled with no disease present. I'm on my second recurrance now and again, no lymph system involvement.

foxhd's picture
Posts: 2689
Joined: Oct 2011

I had at least one lymph node involved at time of surgery. 2 or 3 more were tested and and found to be clean. 8 months later, not so good.

Subscribe to Comments for "Was an effected lymph node or nodes always found before mets was diagnosed?"