HN125 new anti-OVCA therapy

LaundryQueen
LaundryQueen Member Posts: 676
This information is the result of preliminary research that will take years to trickle down to benefit any of us. Nevertheless, it is pretty exciting for me to find this as I am still somewhat of a "chemophobe."

For those of you who get blurry-eyed when reading scientific research, let me break it down for you:

Basically, CA-125 (aka MUC16) and is a protein found on the surface of epithelial OVCA that is not only a tumor marker but ALSO an "antigen" (another word for a protein that causes an antibody response--like an allergic reaction) that actually PROMOTES ovarian cancer.

Other research [which I can post but it will make your head spin] has shown that when MUC16 is blocked, there is much less platinum resistance of OVCA and more sensitivity to other chemo agents also. So that is the reason why this kind of research is being done in the first place.

A new therapy called "HN125" has been developed which targets those cancer cells that have CA-125 (MUC16) on them and basically kills them ("...strong...cytotoxicity against MUC16 positive cancer cells in vitro"). "In vitro" means the therapy was used outside the body on cancer cell lines where therapeutic agents are always used first before they are tested inside the body--first in mice, then in humans.

Think of this as similar to an allergy shot for some people with OVC--I think it only goes after the epithelial OVCAs. The key to this therapy is having a functioning immune system. So file it under "biological therapy" in your brain and pray that it gets "fast-tracked."

See below for the article on HN125:

J Cancer. 2011;2:280-91. Epub 2011 May 16.
HN125: A Novel Immunoadhesin Targeting MUC16 with Potential for Cancer Therapy.
Xiang X, Feng M, Felder M, Connor JP, Man YG, Patankar MS, Ho M.
Source1. Antibody Therapy Unit, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA;

Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mucin MUC16 expresses the repeating peptide epitope CA125 that has been known for decades to be a well-validated cancer marker that is overexpressed on the cell surface of ovarian cancers and other malignant tumors. In spite of recent efforts to make mouse monoclonal antibodies to MUC16 to treat ovarian cancer, a human monoclonal antibody against this mucin has not been described. MUC16 interacts with mesothelin, a protein that mediates heterotypic cancer cell adhesion, indicating that MUC16 and mesothelin play an important role in the peritoneal implantation and metastasis of ovarian tumors. Therefore, a suitable candidate for therapeutic targeting of MUC16 would functionally block the interaction of MUC16 and mesothelin.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we report the generation of a novel immunoadhesin, HN125, against MUC16 that consists of a functional MUC16 binding domain of mesothelin (IAB) and the Fc portion of a human antibody IgG1. The yield for purified HN125 proteins is over 100 µg/mL of HEK-293 culture supernatant. We show that HN125 has high and specific affinity for MUC16-expressing cancer cells by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. HN125 has the ability to disrupt the heterotypic cancer cell adhesion mediated by the MUC16-mesothelin interaction. Moreover, it elicits strong antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity against MUC16-positive cancer cells in vitro.

CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This report describes a novel human immunotherapeutic agent highly specific for MUC16 with potential for treating ovarian cancer and other MUC16-expressing tumors. Because of its lower immunogenicity in patients, a fully human protein is the most desirable format for clinical applications. We believe that the methods developed here may apply to the generation of other tumor-targeting immunoadhesins when it is difficult to obtain a human monoclonal antibody to a given antigen for clinical applications. The resultant immunoadhesins can have advantages usually found in monoclonal antibodies such as ease of purification, high binding affinity and effector functions.

Comments

  • LaundryQueen
    LaundryQueen Member Posts: 676
    More on MUC16 (CA-125)
    For those of you who can't get enough of this stuff...hahahahahaha!

    Glossary of terminology:

    NIH:OVCAR3 cells = ovarian cancer cells donated from NIH for research

    CA125-negative SKOV3 cells = ovarian cancer cells donated from Sloan-Kettering that don't express CA-125

    IC(50) = IC50 represents the concentration of a drug that is required for 50% inhibition in vitro.


    Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Dec;115(3):407-13. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
    CA125 (MUC16) tumor antigen selectively modulates the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to genotoxic drug-induced apoptosis.
    Boivin M, Lane D, Piché A, Rancourt C.
    Source
    Département de Microbiologie et Infectiologie, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12ième Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke J1H 5N1, Canada.

    Abstract
    OBJECTIVE:
    Little is known about the biological functions of CA125/MUC16 tumor antigen. Here, we examined the role of CA125/MUC16 in regulating the sensitivity of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) cells to different drugs.

    METHODS:
    An endoplasmic reticulum targeted single-chain antibody (scFv) was used to down-regulate cell surface expression of CA125/MUC16 in NIH:OVCAR3 cells and the C-terminal domain (CTD) of MUC16 was ectopically expressed in CA125-negative SKOV3 cells. Sensitivity to genotoxic agents and to inhibitors of microtubule depolymerization was examined in NIH:OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell sublines. Cell viability was determined by XTT assay, apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and caspase activation by Western blot and fluorogenic assay.

    RESULTS:
    Down-regulation of cell surface MUC16 decreases cisplatin IC(50) by 5-fold in NIH:OVCAR3 cells but does not affect paclitaxel IC(50). We found that the sensitivity to other genotoxic agents such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicine and etoposide was also increased by down-regulation of MUC16. Caspase-9 and caspase-3 activation also significantly augmented in cisplatin-treated NIH:OVCAR3 cells expressing the anti-MUC16 scFv. Ectopic expression of MUC16 CTD has the opposite effect. Cisplatin sensitivity and caspases activation are decreased by the ectopic expression of MUC16 CTD in SKOV3 cells.

    CONCLUSIONS:
    CA125/MUC16 selectively modulates the sensitivity of EOC cells to genotoxic agents. The MUC16 CTD appears to be sufficient to promote cisplatin resistance.

    PMID:
    19747716
    [PubMed - indexed
  • carolenk
    carolenk Member Posts: 907 Member

    More on MUC16 (CA-125)
    For those of you who can't get enough of this stuff...hahahahahaha!

    Glossary of terminology:

    NIH:OVCAR3 cells = ovarian cancer cells donated from NIH for research

    CA125-negative SKOV3 cells = ovarian cancer cells donated from Sloan-Kettering that don't express CA-125

    IC(50) = IC50 represents the concentration of a drug that is required for 50% inhibition in vitro.


    Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Dec;115(3):407-13. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
    CA125 (MUC16) tumor antigen selectively modulates the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to genotoxic drug-induced apoptosis.
    Boivin M, Lane D, Piché A, Rancourt C.
    Source
    Département de Microbiologie et Infectiologie, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12ième Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke J1H 5N1, Canada.

    Abstract
    OBJECTIVE:
    Little is known about the biological functions of CA125/MUC16 tumor antigen. Here, we examined the role of CA125/MUC16 in regulating the sensitivity of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) cells to different drugs.

    METHODS:
    An endoplasmic reticulum targeted single-chain antibody (scFv) was used to down-regulate cell surface expression of CA125/MUC16 in NIH:OVCAR3 cells and the C-terminal domain (CTD) of MUC16 was ectopically expressed in CA125-negative SKOV3 cells. Sensitivity to genotoxic agents and to inhibitors of microtubule depolymerization was examined in NIH:OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell sublines. Cell viability was determined by XTT assay, apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and caspase activation by Western blot and fluorogenic assay.

    RESULTS:
    Down-regulation of cell surface MUC16 decreases cisplatin IC(50) by 5-fold in NIH:OVCAR3 cells but does not affect paclitaxel IC(50). We found that the sensitivity to other genotoxic agents such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicine and etoposide was also increased by down-regulation of MUC16. Caspase-9 and caspase-3 activation also significantly augmented in cisplatin-treated NIH:OVCAR3 cells expressing the anti-MUC16 scFv. Ectopic expression of MUC16 CTD has the opposite effect. Cisplatin sensitivity and caspases activation are decreased by the ectopic expression of MUC16 CTD in SKOV3 cells.

    CONCLUSIONS:
    CA125/MUC16 selectively modulates the sensitivity of EOC cells to genotoxic agents. The MUC16 CTD appears to be sufficient to promote cisplatin resistance.

    PMID:
    19747716
    [PubMed - indexed

    Thanks!
    Dear LQ

    It seems like my oncologist didn't seem to care how high the CA-125 was as long as it dropped during treatment. It looks like there is something different about taxol but I can't figure out what the significance of that is.

    I like the idea of biological therapy, too.

    Carolen
  • Tina Brown
    Tina Brown Member Posts: 1,036 Member
    carolenk said:

    Thanks!
    Dear LQ

    It seems like my oncologist didn't seem to care how high the CA-125 was as long as it dropped during treatment. It looks like there is something different about taxol but I can't figure out what the significance of that is.

    I like the idea of biological therapy, too.

    Carolen

    High CA 125
    Dear Carolen
    Your theory on "didn't seem to care how high the CA-125 was as long as it dropped" makes a lot of sense to me. My CA125 is currently 95 and I feel very well - no symptoms. It dropped after my final chemo from 122 and my oncologist was pretty pleased. They are happy to just monitor me every 2 months. I must admit I was quite wary because it didn't go down to below 35, but after reading your post I understand it now.

    Thanks Tina x
  • carolenk
    carolenk Member Posts: 907 Member

    High CA 125
    Dear Carolen
    Your theory on "didn't seem to care how high the CA-125 was as long as it dropped" makes a lot of sense to me. My CA125 is currently 95 and I feel very well - no symptoms. It dropped after my final chemo from 122 and my oncologist was pretty pleased. They are happy to just monitor me every 2 months. I must admit I was quite wary because it didn't go down to below 35, but after reading your post I understand it now.

    Thanks Tina x

    I wonder if the "human
    I wonder if the "human protein" that works against CA-125 already exists in the women who are cured of OVCA? I was thinking of Rhogam that is made from Rh-negative women who have antibodies against Rh-postive blood.

    Rhogam is given to Rh-negative women who are pregnant with an Rh-positive baby to save the life of the baby. I don't completely understand how Rhogam works or maybe I got the idea from watching the TV program called "House."

    There was an episode where a mother & newborn baby both had the same cancer but the mom's body was making antibodies that could be used to save the baby. The mom delayed her treatment so she could make enough antibodies to save the baby...and, of course, the baby was cured & the mom ended up dying. What a tear jerker that was!

    But anyway, wouldn't it be awesome if "the magic bullet" already exists? I have always said that more research should be on long-term survivors.

    Carolen