<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://csn.cancer.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Cancer Survivors Network - Recent Studies of Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Most Women Survive - Comments</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Recent Studies of Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Most Women Survive&quot;</description>
 <language>en-csn</language>
<item>
 <title>Recent Studies of Triple Negative Breast Cancer</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-983465</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mimi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One must be careful when looking at studies. These 2 studies were done in China on Asian women who lived there. It has been found that there stats differ greatly from American women. According to a 2010 article in the Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology: &quot;The incidence and mortality of breast cancer are lower in Asia than in the West, particularly in post-menopausal women, but they are increasing. The age patterns of the incidence of breast cancer in Asia differ from in the West: in most Asian countries the peak incidence of breast cancer is at about age 45–50, whereas in western countries the incidence continues to increase even at older ages. Mortality is decreasing in western countries, whereas it is still increasing in Asian nations&quot;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And from an editorial published by Cancer Research UK Lab, Imperial College, London:  &quot;To date, all the published data with regard to Asian women has been based on immunohistochemical phenotype and no molecular based studies exist. Such studies would be of interest in terms of examining whether there are any differences between the molecular signature of ‘Western triple negative&#039; as compared to an ‘Asian triple negative&#039; breast cancer, or indeed any differences between different Asian sub-populations.&quot;  That could play an important role in why the recurrence and survival rates are different from white American women.  (The rates are also different for African-American women).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually the news for triple negs isn&#039;t all bad. Although a recurrence can happen sooner, our greatest risk of recurrence happens around our 2nd to 3rd year anniversary (from diagnosis). After the 3rd anniversary, it drops off drastically. And then again after the 5 yr anniversary it drops significantly. At that point our chance of recurrence is less than the positive receptor women. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the National Cancer Institute SEER stats do not differentiate between trip neg and receptor positive cancer, the overall 5 yr relative survival rate for a stage 1-2a is 98%; stage 2b-3c is 83.6%.  These are for 1999-2006. (Relative survival is an estimate of the percentage of patients who would be expected to survive the effects of their cancer.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Until more research is done on the molecular study of tumors of Asian women that would prove otherwise, I&#039;d have to say that our chances of survival are better than what the Chinese studies show!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We really need for the National Cancer Institute to conduct studies strictly on triple negative bc. Unfortunately I was told that no such study was even being considered. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hang in there, ladies.....they are making progress on PARP inhibitors and other drugs!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:49:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Echo 2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 983465 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Glad that I could help put you in a good mood, Joe and Moopy!</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-733328</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Now that makes MY day. Oh, and Joe, just refreshed and saw your smoking dog! LOL. Shame, shame. Doesn&#039;t your dog understand the dangers of smoking? And on a cancer site, too!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:11:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mimivac</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 733328 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>LOL!!!</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-733321</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Love the pic, Joe!! &lt;font size=3 color=hotpink&gt;&amp;hearts;&lt;I&gt;Pammy&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:47:19 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Akiss4me</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 733321 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thank you for finding and</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-732938</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for finding and posting excellent info Mimi!  I love reading your posts!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Leeza&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:03:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jnl</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 732938 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Magnificent Mimi strikes again!</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-732930</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mimi, I caught your post while I was having an office hour this afternoon. The kids in my Global Studies class had to wonder why I was in such a bizarrely good mood. Thanks for this find and for all of the useful and affirming information you continue to find for &quot;triple negatives&quot; and the people who love them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Joe&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:43:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Aortus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 732930 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-732925</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Mimi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am triple negative and this is great info.  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:39:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>always</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 732925 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Many Thanks, Mimi</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-732901</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for this wonderful information, Mimi. You lift my spirits, as you have so often  over the last 10 months. I can remember being at an early chemo treatment, when Joe found a PM message from you that brightened my outlook and cheered me, even as I sat there with the IV. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:05:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Moopy23</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 732901 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thank you so much for</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-732739</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you so much for sharing this.  I am ER+ but my good friend at work is triple neg and I know she will get a boost from hearing this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:15:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CypressCynthia</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 732739 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Congrats on being done!</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-732653</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;My stats are similar to yours, though my tumor was slightly bigger. We do have an excellent prognosis. Hope you really celebrated over the weekend!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mimi&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:43:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mimivac</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 732653 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Great post again Mimi!  We</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-732622</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Great post again Mimi!  We all appreciate your always giving us good information!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Viner Hand ITC&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;crimson&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hugs, Diane ♥&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:01:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DianeBC</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 732622 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>THANKS MIM</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-732620</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I am triple negative......thanks for the info....I appreciate it.  I finished ALL my treatment last Friday...Both my oncologists said I have an excellent prognosis.. I was stage I but went to stage II on the table due to size.....2.2 cm...no lymph node involvement. Caught very early.&lt;br /&gt;
Again, thanks for the info&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MAJW</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 732620 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mimi, this posting is good</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-732584</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mimi, this posting is good for those who are triple negative. I have always felt like those of us who are estrogen positive had a raw deal because we had ongoing treatment that had adverse side effects.  I know that there is not a &quot;good&quot; cancer, but this study gives some hope to those who are triple negatve.  Thanks for the post. Hugs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Judy&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:36:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>creampuff91344</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 732584 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks Mimi for posting some</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment-732516</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Mimi for posting some very valuable information again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Debby&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:20:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DebbyM</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 732516 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Recent Studies of Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Most Women Survive</title>
 <link>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;From http://www.hormonenegative.blogspot.com/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most of the time when we look at statistics, they are already dated and represent survival rates that are several years old. In the time since the study, new treatments are found and survival rates usually continue to improve. So, new studies, updating survival stats are always relevant. Here is some good news from 2 recent studies of triple negative breast cancer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two recent studies in China add definition to the characteristics of triple negative breast cancer in an Asian population: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In research published in Clinical Oncology August 25, 2009 on 770 breast cancer patients at Shenzhen People’s Hospital, 17.1 percent, or 130 cases, were triple negative. The characteristics of TNBC patients:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://csn.cancer.org/node/179013#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://csn.cancer.org/taxonomy/term/127">Breast Cancer</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:00:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mimivac</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">179013 at http://csn.cancer.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

